Choose your Article Focus | NGS | Molecular & Serology
Andrew Anfora, PhD
Recent Posts
The Promise of Liquid Biopsy: A Q&A with Dr. Claudia Vollbrecht
Category: ccfDNA, cfDNA, NGS, ctDNA, reference materials
Posted by
Andrew Anfora, PhD on Mar 24, 2021 12:00:00 AM
This is Part 3 in a 3-part Q&A blog series with a panel of liquid biopsy experts addressing many of the issues faced in developing and deploying NGS-based liquid biopsy assays for clinical applications in oncology. At a 2020 liquid biopsy webinar, Dr. Vollbrecht shared a molecular pathologist’s perspective on the current state of liquid biopsy. Laboratory processing and analysis of cfDNA samples is a multi-step process that requires a high degree of precision to achieve consistent results. Her presentation focused on pre-analytics variables, which are often left out of discussions and tend to focus on biochemical manipulation of isolated nucleic acids. Seemingly simple factors at the point of sample collection such as problems with blood test tube filling, storage and labelling are able to affect the cfDNA stability, abundance, and confound the reliability of final interpretation. Variation in sample treatment during laboratory processing, including but not limited to, cfDNA quantification and QC methodology are also amongst the challenges for liquid biopsy.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Multi-Lab Study of Fusion RNA Reference Standards for Targeted NGS
Category: NTRK, NGS, RNA fusion, reference materials, AACR
Posted by
Andrew Anfora, PhD on Jan 28, 2020 12:00:00 AM
Sourcing assay validation samples as positive run controls or workflow controls in targeted NGS RNA fusion assays remains a challenge today. This is further exacerbated with clinical labs looking to provide validated NGS assays for patient stratification in a host of new drugs in clinical trials or newly approved targeting fusion genes, such as NTRK genes (Larotrectinib, Loxo/Bayer) and Entrectinib (Genentech/Roche) for rare cancers in adult and pediatric patients, and RET (Loxo/Lilly) for lung cancer. SeraCare produces several RNA fusion reference materials. This article describes the development and multi-laboratory evaluation of a pan-cancer multiplexed Fusion RNA reference standard for analysis of clinically relevant fusion genes in solid tumors. The evaluation was conducted at 5 different laboratories on different NGS platforms (amplicon- and hybridization capture-based) as well as at different RNA inputs within a platform. Results highlight the utility of this Fusion RNA reference material to support clinical NGS assays as positive controls in solid tumor cancer patient stratification for many of these fusion-based targeted therapies.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
A Multi-Lab Study of Fusion RNA Reference Standards Using Amplicon- and Hybrid Capture-based Targeted NGS Panels
Category: NGS, Assay Development, RNA fusion
Posted by
Andrew Anfora, PhD on Jan 28, 2020 12:00:00 AM
Introduction Sourcing assay validation samples as positive run controls or workflow controls in targeted NGS RNA fusion assays remains a challenge today. This is further exacerbated with clinical labs looking to provide validated NGS assays for patient stratification in a host of new drugs in clinical trials or newly approved targeting fusion genes, such as NTRK genes (Larotrectinib, Loxo/Bayer) and Entrectinib (Genetech/Roche) for rare cancers in adult and pediatric patients, and RET (Loxo/Lilly) for lung cancer. SeraCare produces several RNA fusion reference materials. This article describes the development and multi-laboratory evaluation of a pan-cancer multiplexed Fusion RNA reference standard for analysis of clinically relevant fusion genes in solid tumors. The evaluation was conducted at 5 different laboratories on different NGS platforms (amplicon- and hybridization capture-based) as well as at different RNA inputs within a platform. Results highlight the utility of this Fusion RNA reference material to support clinical NGS assays as positive controls in solid tumor cancer patient stratification for many of these fusion-based targeted therapies. Data Discussion Fusion RNA Reference Standard Development 18 clinically actionable biosynthetic fusion genes were transcribed and blended with reference cell line human cell line (GM24385, from GIAB), The RNA fusion constructs in the Fusion RNA reference material were blended at ~1500 copies per uL, and measured by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) measurements as well as by an orthogonal targeted NGS assay (Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor and MiSeq v2 300 cycle kit). Results are shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Concentration (blue) and number of unique start sites (green) measured for each fusion RNA in the fusion reference material as determined by RT-dPCR and targeted NGS panel, respectively. Data represent average of three replicate measurements. As shown in Figure 1, all 18 gene fusions in the Fusion RNA reference material were detected on the Archer ST assay, at different levels of abundance. Approximately 50% of the variants showed similar relative abundance between ddPCR and NGS measurements. ~25% of the variants showed an apparent increase in relative abundance as measured by ddPCR, and the remaining ~25% of the gene fusions showed an increase in relative abundance as measured by NGS. A multi-laboratory evaluation of the Fusion RNA reference material was conducted at 5 laboratories (Site A – E, see Table 1). However, this article will focus on evaluations involving the Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor and custom Solid Tumor-based targeted NGS panels. For discussion of all data generated by all laboratories listed in Table 1, check out our poster presentation from AACR 2018. Table 1: Assay, input, and analysis used at Site A – E. Figure 2 demonstrates the reproducibility of the Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor assay across multiple sites and operators from the highly multiplexed contrived Fusion RNA reference material. The discordant data points are likely due to a combination of different operators, use of different analysis software versions, and differences in replicate measurements between sites. To account for the multitude of panel-based assays, one laboratory used a custom panel assay to evaluate the RNA fusion reference material. Beta test Site D used the fusion reference material with a customized Archer FusionPlex assay as shown in Figure 3. The functionality of the customized panel was clearly demonstrated, in addition, a limit of detection study was conducted with the abundant reference material, with most fusions detected at all tested input amounts.[1] [1] For another RNA fusion limit of detection study see our AACR 2019 poster. Summary SeraCare has developed a reference material that contains 18 clinically relevant RNA fusions. The RNA fusion reference material was evaluated at 6 different laboratories. Results of these analysis highlight the robustness of the Seraseq Fusion RNA reference materials in multi-lab concordance studies as well as a tool uniquely suited for limit of detection (LoD) studies. The RNA fusion reference material is also used in analytical validation of targeted NGS panels, and as an objective reference standard for inter-laboratory comparison of NGS assay performance. A similar multi-lab evaluation of the FFPE Fusion RNA reference materials will be published shortly.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments