Diagnostic Precision

A SeraCare blog focused on precision medicine and advanced clinical diagnostics

Choose your Article Focus | NGS | Molecular & Serology

The Full Authority Companion Diagnostic

Category: FDA, clinical genomics, NGS

Posted by Yves Konigshofer, PhD on Feb 21, 2019 12:00:00 AM
It is very likely that on your last flight the turbofan engines were controlled by full authority digital engine controls – FADECs for short. FADECs have played a significant role in keeping airline ticket prices low (except during holidays) by continually adjusting engine parameters so that the engine operates with maximum fuel efficiency and within operational limits, allowing pilots to focus on other tasks.
Read More

Futureproof Your Clinical Genomics Lab’s Compliance: 3 Tips to Prepare for Potential Requirements

Category: FDA, clinical genomics

Posted by Dale Yuzuki on May 18, 2017 12:00:00 AM
While clinical genomics labs (those running NGS-based laboratory developed tests) are not currently subject to FDA oversight, that doesn’t mean they won’t be someday. The question is, how soon will that day come and, when it does, will your lab be ready?
Read More

Highlights from the Precision Medicine World Congress

Category: FDA, clinical genomics, ngs validation, NGS, cancer, EGFR

Posted by Russell Garlick, PhD on Feb 15, 2017 12:00:00 AM
On January 23-25, 2017 the Precision Medicine World Congress was held in Mountain View, California. The PWMC conference kicked off with Dr. Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Science and Policy and Strategy UCSF, with Dr. Robert Califf, FDA Commissioner in a “fireside chat” format. Dr. Califf has been with the FDA for 2 years, has served as Commissioner for 11 months, but has resigned as of January 20th 2017. One of his important parting thoughts presented was how the FDA has been re-energized by the >21st Century Cures Act to hire new scientific talent to implement the President’s Precision Medicine and Cancer Moonshot plans.
Read More

Reference Materials for Your Unique Reproducibility Needs

Category: FDA, SeraSeq, clinical genomics, NGS, reference materials

Posted by Matt Ryder on Oct 12, 2016 12:00:00 AM
If you took a university introductory statistics course, you may have learned the distinction between accuracy and precision. It may likely have been presented with an archery analogy, where ‘Accurate’ was represented by arrows loosely clustered around the target’s bull’s-eye, ‘Precise’ was shown as a tight grouping displaced from the center, and ‘Accurate and Precise’ was depicted as what every archer aims for, a tight grouping directly at the bull’s-eye. Suddenly, words that are used interchangeably in everyday conversation took on dramatically different meanings.
Read More

FDA-AACR Liquid Biopsies in Oncology Drug and Device Workshop

Category: FDA, clinical genomics, NGS, cancer, LDT, ctDNA, reference materials

Posted by Yves Konigshofer, PhD on Aug 8, 2016 12:00:00 AM
The presentations during the FDA-AACR Liquid Biopsies in Oncology Drug and Device Development Workshop on July 19, 2016 included several important pieces of information that will likely guide the development of assays and their review by the FDA.
Read More

IVD Guidance for NGS Manufacturers

Category: FDA, clinical genomics, NGS, LDT, reference materials

Posted by Russell Garlick, PhD on Jul 14, 2016 12:00:00 AM
After 17 months of deliberations since its first open meeting February 20, 2015 on NGS IVD assay oversight, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued DRAFT guidance for Stakeholders and FDA staff. The document “Use of Standards in FDA Regulatory Oversight of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) Used for Diagnosing Germline Diseases” was published online on July 6, 2016. This document (PDF located here) is for analytical validity and not for clinical validation.
Read More

LDT Oversight: Why the FDA makes a point

Category: FDA, LDT, reference materials

Posted by Trevor Brown on Dec 21, 2015 12:00:00 AM
Recently, the FDA upped the ante in the ongoing debate over its desire to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) with the release of a report detailing the ‘real and potential harms to patients and to public health’ arising from LDTs. This debate has been heating up for several years now—not coincidentally with the emergence of precision medicine and the rapid adoption of data-intensive tools such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and the growing pipelines of targeted therapeutics. One might argue that the horse has already left the barn and the FDA are trying to corral it back in.
Read More